|
Patrick
Kavanagh said it well of an affair he once had:
“On Grafton Street in November
we tripped lightly along the ledge
Of the deep ravine where can be seen the worth of passion’s
pledge,
The Queen of Hearts still making tarts and I not making hay -
O I loved too much and by such is happiness thrown away”.
Another wise man put it less poetically but none
the less insightfully in pointing out that it’s not the hating
that gets to you; it’s the loving. For quite some time now
Ireland has been having a torrid love affair with the drink, an
affair that is passionate and exciting and reckless and that is
most likely to change until the affair loses some of its sheen or
until we find another lover.
During the last few years there have been a number
of high profile reports showing that Ireland sits at the top of
the European table of heavy drinking. Per head of population we
consume more alcohol than any other country in Europe and if you
want to examine where we sit in the world table then you will find
that we are not all that far from topping the league. Within the
various reports there is an increasing acknowledgement of the human
price that is now being paid for that level of drinking and the
price that will be paid in the future.
In all the studies I have referred to there are
two common themes. The first is that there is a direct relationship
between the year-to-year increases or decreases in the alcohol consumption
level and the year-to-year increases or decreases in deaths from
a variety of causes where alcohol is involved. They all point up
the reality that when you increase the amount of alcohol drunk in
a country then you increase the amount of harm done to the population
of that country. Decrease the amount of alcohol drunk in a country
and you decrease the amount of harm to the population. In the last
ten years or so, as it became the fastest growing economy in Europe,
Ireland has had the highest increase in alcohol consumption among
all the EU countries.
The harm and damage that results across the complete
spectrum has increased proportionately. Injuries and personal harm
have increased, relationships have been damaged or destroyed, violence
in public places has got scary, mental health problems are on the
rise and the cost, financially and socially, keeps increasing. I
am not going to burden you with all the statistics and the horror
stories because I think it was captured in typical Irish fashion
by a Gardai I met in Sligo recently who said ‘Take the drinking
out of it and I’m not sure there would be a job left for me
at all’.
The second theme moving through many of the reports
published recently is one to do with culture. One of those reports,
maybe the best of them, issued by the Department of Health and Children
in Dublin in 2002 and called the Strategic Task Force on Alcohol
says that the amount of harm that results from each litre of alcohol
drunk varies from one end of Europe to another. They are pointing
out that as well as the amount drunk, the patterns and the culture
around drinking are also important and I quote ‘This kind
of finding often brings suggestions and even campaigns, the report
says, to change a nation’s drinking culture, for instance
to resemble the characteristic drinking patterns of southern European
‘ wine cultures’. But the experience has been, instead,
that in a given culture the characteristic drinking patterns are
deep-rooted and resistant to change; when new drinking habits are
encouraged, they often add onto the old ones, rather than replacing
them. Examples of a successful shift in a national drinking culture
to less problematic drinking are few indeed’ The findings
are that, while attention to drinking patterns may be worthwhile,
it is not a substitute for a focus on the general level of consumption
on a population.
I agree with the thrust and the sense of that
argument and I am convinced that if we are ever to seriously and
effectively counteract the already alarming and growing problems
that we have with alcohol, then we are going to have to focus on
reducing the amount of alcohol we drink in this country. I am a
believer in politics and convinced of the power of legislation to
define and refine the behaviour of citizens of any country. If we
are going to reverse the upward trend of alcohol consumption and
the obvious levels of harm that are resulting, then it is going
to take a great amount of political will and tough legislation for
that to be achieved.
I am delighted and impressed that the broad political
debate, focusing on economics and legislation, has been led and
informed by research that is so thorough and compelling, both in
its data and presentation, that it is nigh impossible to ignore.
I am saddened by the fact that nearly all the research and the resulting
knowledge is coming from across the border, from the Republic, and
that apart from some rather outdated material we have little or
no knowledge of what is happening here in the north. The substantial
debate is also happening down south and we have little or no part
in it.
Here in the north, we have, with the last few
years, combined illicit drugs with alcohol in our policy documents
and procedures and have allowed the drugs to take the limelight
and the money away from the alcohol problem. But at least the debate
is happening somewhere on the island and it is informing and challenging
those of us who are sidelined. It is a debate that is now well-informed
and based on sound and solid data. It is that data and that research
that I am mostly borrowing from to inform this talk. I am making
an assumption that there is not that much difference between how
Donegal and Derry drink and while Belfast may be a distance from
Cork I am assuming that they are pretty close in drinking terms.
Governments, of course, can always ignore even
the most convincing research but at least they must do so now with
an uneasy conscience. I am somewhat bemused, however, if not completely
surprised at the readiness to underplay and avoid the cultural aspects
of drinking. Culture is such a difficult word to define and almost
impossible to describe. As the world grows smaller, in travelling
terms, and accessibility and crossover increases as a result of
the communication revolution, then cultural integrity, as something
distinct and identifiable, becomes all the more difficult. But because
something is difficult is surely not a reason for ignoring it. Perhaps,
indeed, the opposite! Culture is an important part of the substance
of all our lives and of all the levels of our lives, from the material
through the intellectual and the spiritual. It is inadequately,
but not improperly, understood as the image or sense we have of
ourselves as a people. It would seem to me as extremely important
that we have knowledge of ourselves, our history and the factors
and the experiences that have constituted and informed that culture
and self-image.
For decades we had struggled to grow away from
the colonialism and the unresolved political fractures that still
continue to dog us and perhaps during the sixty or seventy years
of relative poverty and obscurity the only things we could look
to, as a source of pride and contribution to the world, was our
Diaspora, our emigrants, and a few world-renowned writers.
We always had a strand of problem drinkers and
alcoholism in our history, which became even more pronounced in
our Diaspora, but we also had a very great number of our people
who were teetotal and lifelong non-drinkers. That portion of non-drinkers
remains high to the present day. Figures published in the last month
show that almost twenty three per cent of the population still do
not drink. Despite that seam of problem drinkers we were a low-alcohol
consumption country and came far down the European and world league
of consumption. We had our problems, but they were proportionate
to our history, our economy and the perennial nature of addiction.
And then in the nineties it took off. The Irish economy boomed and
so did our drinking. Within ten years the amount of alcohol we drank
increased by fifty per cent and we jumped from near the relegation
zone to the top of the premier division. And the research has proven
true and accurate. The latest investigation shows that the harm
related indices put us out front in all the damaged areas. Ireland
has truly found itself awash with drink.
Many commentators equate the boom in drinking
with the boom in money and while I have little doubt that there
is a big and important connection, I refuse to believe that it is
as simple or as linear as that. I am, perhaps, of the John Healy
School of Thought. John Healy or ‘Backbencher’ as he
called his column in the Irish Times, years ago, used to maintain,
almost on a weekly basis, that a country is bigger than an economy.
If drinking is related only and solely to the changing economic
climates, then I would have to ask the question why any government
should spend money on health education regarding alcohol. But more
importantly it creates a strange and maybe even dangerous equation
that asserts that we will bring our drinking under control again
only when we become economically poor again.
Anyway, there is little fun in economics. Of all
the sciences, it is perhaps the most boring. I have enough Irish
blood in me to want to find someone to blame. There is no fun if
you can’t personalise and name the culprits. So I blame Jack
Charlton and Michael Flatly.
In 1991 I asked James Mackey to give a lecture
here in Derry. He entitled it ‘Derry in Britain in Europe,
The Last Men on Earth, The Last of the Free’. In addressing
Irish culture he wrote the following: ‘At the other end of
the cultural kaleidoscope furthest from the artist, is thought to
reside the football fan. And yet the Irish experience on the continent
during the recent World Cup (the Jack Charlton World Cup) can surely
reverse our judgement. Our fans put us on the map. Not just geographically,
though that is important too. I can still remember how surprised
and disappointed I was when I first travelled extensively in Europe
in the early 50's to find that few, even in travel agencies, knew
where I had come from. No matter how I rolled the ‘r’
in Ireland or Ireland, they still seemed to think that I was talking
about Holland or Iceland or an island on a European lake somewhere.
Our football fans changed that but they did more - more even than
promise an increase in our tourist revenue. They actually make people
want to come and see the culture they embodied, rooted as culture
always is, even in the very physical features of their native place.
For they did embody their culture in this way, just as much as the
monks and scholars who preceded them embodied it in their way. They
came to celebrate victory and to prove noble in defeat, to enjoy
the hospitality offered to them to reward it, not merely with money
but with their own colourful presence and their particular idiom,
and so to leave these peoples and places enriched, and certainly
no worse off for their having passed that way. Culture is incarnate
in all manner of comportment and in all various groupings that make
a particular people. Any form of practice which embodies a value
worth having or pursuing is a part of culture and will enrich any
who encounter it, provided only that it is not used to dominate
or control’. That was written in 1991, not all that long after
the Irish team had done so well in the World Cup and the Irish Fans
acclaimed the best in the world.
We found ourselves around that time. Or at least thought we did.
Our confidence and our self-esteem shot up the Richter Scale. We
came out of the shadows and our passport and our identity became
badges of honour and distinction. We could party like no other.
We had the ‘craic’ like no other had. We knew how to
enjoy ourselves like no other. We knew how to rejoice in victory
and defeat like no other. The passions were released and displayed,
and were good humoured and inoffensive. And at the centre of it
all was the drink. Growing quantities of drink, resulting, in the
short term, seemingly only in hangovers. To give it even more power
and rhythm Michael Flatly came dancing into the middle of it, releasing
a passion that had been perhaps pent up for generations.
Continuing the same theme I wrote a short article
a few years ago about George Best and his infamous Antibuse transplant.
I wrote that ‘We Irish are in love with the image of ourselves
as fun loving, carefree, warm and gregarious people. We are in love
with the intimacy and the hilarity that drinking provides. We are
also in love with the idea of being loved and admired by other peoples
and nations. We have travelled widely and have come to the conclusion
that our personality and our approach to living, are preferable
to what we see in others. And much of what we judge to be better
is most vividly demonstrated and incarnated in our drinking.
Just as George Best had a genius for football
and we believe we have a genius for living. And perhaps we do. But
just as the genius that George Best was gifted with drove him or
lured him into an affair with drink, so the genius that has been
gifted to the Irish is steering us down the same path. George, like
most drinkers, had little understanding that he was getting himself
embroiled in a relationship with the most wonderful and the most
seductive drug that man has ever discovered. Alcohol has the consistent
power to make us feel better, even when we already feel good, and
to feel good even when we feel bad. It does it with consummate ease
and consistency, and initially the only kickback is an acceptable
and temporary hangover. Of all drugs, it is the one that spreads
its magic most alluringly, and its poison least dramatically. And
those who are unaware of its magic and its poison are like flies
being drawn to a spider’s web.
That is what Ireland has come to learn during
the last number of years. Until recently, had you asked parents
their biggest concern for their children, I am sure illicit drugs
would have been the answer. Two weeks ago the Policing Board published
a postal survey that revealed that after burglary, the single biggest
issue that frightened people was underage drinking and among catholic
respondents it was the biggest. Stark and informative as that may
be, let it not fool us that drinking is only a teenage and young
person’s problem.
But it would be unwise to believe that culture
begins and ends with the ‘craic’, the music, the song
and the particular idiom. Culture always reaches and is inculcated
with the religious and spiritual dimension. Culture that is not
informed and underpinned by meaning and faith and hope, or, in AA
terms, by a higher power, is a culture that has very hollow legs.
If it is blessed and dignified by nothing other than the spirit
of alcohol then the party is unlikely to be sustained. It will break
down into loneliness. That is now happening to Ireland to some great
degree. Ireland at drink was captured by a recent Prime Time programme
on RTE when they put cameras in six cities and towns scattered across
the country. The images were stark and saddening. So many of our
youth in a stupor or seeking stupor! Even those of us who knew it
was happening were silenced by the crudeness and crudity of the
drunkenness. It wasn’t all or nearly all our young people,
of course. But then again the cameras were only on the streets and
not in houses and the flats where equal amounts of communal or lonely
drunkenness abounds. We have a problem and as anyone recovering
form an addiction problem knows only too well, the first step in
recovery is to admit the problem. Not to exaggerate or embellish
the problem but to acknowledge it with as much truthfulness and
integrity as possible.
If it is true, as I believe it to be, that an
individual man or woman is unlikely to make a healthly and contented
recovery from addiction without a deep rooted spiritual insight
that underpins and sustains that recovery, then I believe that it
is equally true for a nation and a people. It is certainly ironic
and perhaps even cruel, that at a time when our drinking was becoming
enormously problematic, so the religious structures and rituals
that had been so central to Irish life were entering a crisis. The
very institutions who claimed to be the light in a dark world, who
claimed to be the guardians of ‘the way, the truth and the
light’ were being exposed as deeply corrupt and sinful. At
a time when they were greatly needed by so many, they were instead
embroiled and distracted by their own history and problems. Not
that religious institutions are, in themselves, the font of faith
and spirituality. That comes from a deeper well than any human institution
can provide. And we need to be honest enough to admit that we, the
Irish, were too willing and too naïve in giving undue status
and authority to Church and Churches who were willing to accept
it. And we need to be mature enough to admit that we were late-comers
to this crisis of faith and meaning. It had seared through Europe
after the Second World War. In 1946 Pascal, a French scientist had
written: ‘On beholding the blindness and misery of man, on
seeing all the universe dumb, and man without light, left to himself,
as it were, astray in this corner of the universe, knowing not who
had set him here, what he is here for, or what will become of him
when he dies, incapable of all knowledge, I begin to be afraid,
as a man who has been carried while asleep to a fearful desert island,
and who will awake not knowing where he is and without any means
of quitting the island’.
Alcohol is a depressant drug. With persistent
and heavy use it has the potential to bring us to Pascal’s
island. Those of you who work and help in Northlands and those of
you who have gone there for help, know only too well the numbers
of addicted people who have or still do inhabit that island. You
might even agree with me that, as well as the political will and
the enabling legislation, Ireland needs a spiritual revolution.
It cannot be the childish spirituality of the past. It will have
to admit that faith, if and when it is gifted, is not a state of
certainty and security but one that is fragile and riddled with
doubt. It must not be a spirituality that is narrow and sectarian
in its vision. It might be best captured by Henri Nouwen, one of
the finest Catholic spiritual writers of modern times. In 1985 he
resigned his professorship at Harvard University, saying that it
had brought him to the brink of spiritual crisis, that indeed he
was ‘in danger of losing his soul’. He wrote ‘During
all these years, I learned that Protestants belong as much to the
church as Catholics, and that Hindus, Buddhists, and Muslims believe
in God as much as Christians do; that pagans can love one another
as much as believers can; that the human psyche is multi dimensional,
that theology, psychology, and sociology intersect in many places;
that women have a call to read the ministry; that homosexual people
have a unique vocation in the Christian community; that the poor
belong to the heart of the church; and that the spirit of God blows
where it wants. All of these discoveries gradually broke down many
fences that had given me a safe garden and made me deeply aware
that God’s covenant with God’s people included everyone.
For me personally, it was a time of searching, questioning, and
agonising, a time that was extremely lonely and not without moments
of great inner uncertainty and ambiguity. The Jesus I had come to
know in my youth had died. I was travelling in a downward way to
Emmaus (the journey on which Jesus joined two of his disciples after
his death and he didn’t recognise them) and started hearing
voices of someone who had joined me on the journey’
Northlands, at its best, has espoused that breadth
and depth of spirituality from its earliest days. It has been confirmed
and sustained in that spirituality by thousands of people who have
trusted it with their histories, their fears, their hurts and their
hopes. Its ongoing task is to be a small but significant beacon
as Ireland tries to find a more healthy and wholesome relationship
with drink.
DENIS BRADLEY
|